The host analyzes the Lindsay Clancy case to argue that postpartum psychosis and intrusive thoughts are real but do not excuse infanticide, rejecting the insanity defense as a means of acquittal. The discussion shifts blame from Big Pharma to individual responsibility and a cultural reliance on medication, asserting that doctors and patients share culpability for over-prescribing and under-addressing mental health crises. The host emphasizes the need for societal support systems where women can safely surrender custody during episodes of psychosis rather than facing criminalization.
“If she's found not guilty by reason of insanity, she gets she's not guilty. That means she's fully acquitted of the crime. That means as soon as a doctor determines that she is mentally fine and stable, they have to let her out. They don't get to say, 'Well, you're fine now, but you killed three kids, so we're going to continue to punish you by keeping you in the looney band.'”
“There are some anti-depressants that there's warning labels on them that if you take those, you may have suicidal thoughts, but there are no drugs on the market that come with a warning label of homicidal thoughts.”
“I don't think it's a mitigating factor. I think it's an aggravating factor. I think somebody that has the ability, if their mind has the ability to become homicidal when it snaps, that person's dangerous, and we don't know at what point will they snap again.”
“I know a lot of women in my life who suffered from postpartum depression and it was very scary and it was very difficult but it does not excuse murdering or harming your children ever.”
24m⏭ 2
12m⏭ 2
43m⏭ 1
16m⏭ 1
34m⏭ 2
1h 10m⏭ 1
28m⏭ 4
24m⏭ 1
25m
20m
6h 22m
11h 54m⏭ 8
51m⏭ 1
3h 27m
54m⏭ 3
59m⏭ 1
1h 8m⏭ 1
1h 24m⏭ 1
1h 12m
42m
57m⏭ 1
1h 9m⏭ 2
11h 23m⏭ 1
33m
46m
3h 54m⏭ 7
1h 0m⏭ 1
3h 59m⏭ 5
1h 13m
25m
54m⏭ 1
45m⏭ 2
1h 16m⏭ 2
58m⏭ 5