Results for “NFA”
Guests 1
Transcript mentions 24
See all ›
Suppressing the Second Amendment: Examining DOJ's Posture Toward Firearm Suppressors
5:451934, THE NFA CONGRESS DID NOT BELIEVE IT COULD BAN CERTAIN FIREARMS OUTRIGHT, SO TAXED THEM. INSTEAD. THE NFA HAS6:19THE NFA'S FIREARMS REGISTRATION REGIME, BUT ONLY AS A MEANS OF COLLECTING THE TAX REVENUE6:50SURVIVED. SO DID THE FELONY PENALTIES BEHIND IT. SO WHILE THE TAX FOUNDATION OF THE NFA
🌭🔥 Friday Means ROLLER DOGS! Who’s Ruining Their Weekend First? | Friday 8/28/26
1:25:14By the way, Mike's kneeling down right now. A day that will live in infamy. Don't pat me on my head later, please. Thank you.3:37:54If you've been waiting to buy a suppressor, you need to hear this. The suppressor industry just changed in a massive way. A federal court just struck down key NFA registration requ3:38:10qualifying customers covered by the new court order, that old form 4 NFA process may no longer apply. Instead, eligible suppressor transfers can be completed
Topics & chapters 2
AI summaries 1
Suppressing the Second Amendment: Examining DOJ's Posture Toward Firearm Suppressors
The consensus among law enforcement and industry experts is that suppressors are rarely used in crime and that Congress must act to remove them from the NFA to restore Second Amendment rights.summaryFederal courts have ruled the NFA registration requirement unconstitutional for suppressors since the tax was zeroed out, yet the DOJ continues to defend prosecutions for unregistered suppressors.takeaway
