This panel discussion analyzes the Lindsay Clancy trial through the lens of postpartum psychosis (PPP), contrasting the perspectives of survivors and critics regarding accountability versus medical illness. The conversation highlights the rarity and severity of PPP, the societal stigma surrounding maternal mental health, and the complex debate over whether a mother can be both ill and criminally accountable for her actions.
“Postpartum psychosis means in addition to those symptoms, you also have psychosis, which means a break with reality. You have delusional thoughts... often they have a paranoid flavor to them like somebody's out to get me in some way.”
“When you're in psychosis, you can function normally. No one would have ever known. From the outside, I was on PTO, taking kids to soccer games... and on the inside, I'm talking to voices during the day because I am completely losing it.”
“People want to define her as evil as opposed to ill. And there is a very big difference.”
“She killed her children. She will be held accountable, but punishing her as an evil person who valitionally did this is different from an acknowledgement that she had an illness that drove this behavior and she is still accountable.”
“Justice for the children in this case is taking this and not letting this conversation end with a verdict... making sure that the understanding, the compassion and the treatment and the recognition and all of that is built out so that this doesn't happen to another family.”
33m
1h 12m
26m
21m
52m
14m
32m
24m
6h 22m
51m⏭ 1
3h 27m
54m⏭ 3
59m⏭ 1
1h 49m
1h 1m⏭ 1
1h 42m
1h 28m⏭ 2
59m
29m⏭ 1
1h 36m⏭ 2
11h 23m⏭ 1
2h 35m
1h 0m⏭ 1
46m
3h 54m⏭ 7
33m
3h 59m⏭ 5
48m⏭ 2
37m⏭ 2
38m
56m
54m⏭ 2